ScamLens
Cached < 6hAnonymous (3/day)

Security Report for kdhema.ml

ScamLens analyzed kdhema.ml using 90+ threat intelligence sources and assigned a trust score of 55/100, classifying it as moderate risk.

Trust Score: 55/100

Risk Level: Caution

This result is still in the investigation range, so the domain alone is not enough for a decision. The next step is to cross-check the email, phone number, company identity, and scenario.

Site Title
kdhema.ml
Website meta information unavailable
HTTPS ✓
2
Checked 2 times

Quick Answer

This result is still in the investigation range, so the domain alone is not enough for a decision. The next step is to cross-check the email, phone number, company identity, and scenario.

Positive Signals

  • + Google Safe Browsing: Safe
  • + HTTPS encryption supported

Concerns

  • - High-risk top-level domain (.ml)

Score Breakdown

Domain Reputation 50
Threat Intelligence 96
6/7 safeSafeBrowsing OK
Technical Security 60
HTTPS
Community Reputation 50
No community data yet

Was this assessment accurate?

0 say Safe0 say Suspicious
What do you think?
What to do next

Mixed signals on kdhema.ml

We did not find direct threat-feed hits, but coverage is thin or other signals warrant care.

Confidence:High
  1. Verify the company exists offline
    Search the registered company name + 'reviews' or 'scam'. Real businesses leave a long trail of independent mentions.
  2. Pay only via reversible methods
    Use credit cards or PayPal Goods & Services. Avoid wire transfers, crypto, gift cards — those are non-reversible.
  3. Confirm the contact details
    Look up the phone number and email address separately. Free webmail addresses or VoIP numbers are a red flag.
Cross-check with independent scanners

Trust but verify — open this domain on unrelated security services and compare the verdict.

Sign in to run the AI risk analysis

The threat-intelligence signals below are available to everyone. The plain-language AI risk summary is generated on demand for signed-in users — sign in (free) to run it for this domain.

Threat-intelligence sources

Checked across 26 sources — 1 flagged this domain

Show source breakdown
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • global_timeout clean
  • maltrail flagged
  • openphish clean
  • scam_blocklist clean
  • crypto_scam_feed clean
  • phishing_army clean
  • hagezi_tif clean
  • red_flag_domains clean

ScamLens aggregates real-time signals from 90+ commercial and open-source threat-intelligence providers including Google Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, PhishTank, URLhaus, ThreatFox, Cloudflare Radar, OTX, IPQS, GoPlus, Honeypot.is, and more. A flagged signal is evidence; the absence of flags is not proof of safety. Use the signals below alongside community reports to decide.

Advanced Scan

Comprehensive data lookup across premium sources

$2.99one-time payment
  • Website history verification
  • Detailed WHOIS information
  • Reverse WHOIS association
  • Traffic rank analysis
  • Company registration check
Recommended

AI Deep Investigation

Cross-check the story, claims, and supporting evidence before you decide

$4.99one-time payment
  • Everything in Advanced Scan
  • AI website content analysis
  • AI cross-reference verification
  • Claim authenticity validation
  • Detailed report with evidence
Most Thorough

Comprehensive Investigation

Full-spectrum investigation with company deep search & social intelligence

$14.99one-time payment
  • Everything in Deep Investigation
  • AI company background search
  • Social media intelligence
  • Detailed suspicious point analysis
  • Event timeline & entity connections

This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a legal determination.

Security Sources

Google Safe Browsing
Safe
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
global_timeout Confidence: Low
Not Listed
Maltrail (stamparm) Confidence: Medium
Unsafe
OpenPhish Confidence: Low
Not Listed
Scam Blocklist (Jarelllama) Confidence: Low
Not Listed
Crypto Scam Feed Confidence: Low
Not Listed
Phishing Army Confidence: Low
Not Listed
HaGeZi Threat Intelligence Confidence: Low
Not Listed
Red Flag Domains Confidence: Low
Not Listed

Domain Information

DNSSEC
Disabled

SSL/TLS Certificate

Issuer
C=US, ST=CA, L=San Francisco, O="CloudFlare, Inc.", CN=CloudFlare Inc ECC CA-2
Valid From
March 1, 2020
Valid To
October 9, 2020 Expired
SAN List
kdhema.ml

Server Information

No data available

Related Intelligence

Technical Details (DNS / Headers / Subdomains)

DNS Records

No data available

HTTP Security Headers

Security header detection was blocked by the target website (e.g. rate limiting or access restriction). Results may be inaccurate.

Channels / Subdomains

No data available

Community Reports

Log in to report and share your experience

...

Report & Take Down This Website

The results are based on multiple third-party data sources and AI models. False positives or negatives may occur. This report should not be used as the sole basis for any decision. Please verify with additional sources.

Verify the related evidence objects first

Medium-risk cases are easiest to misread when you only check one signal. Verify the email, phone, and entity before deciding whether to report or stop the transaction.

Continue investigating

If you already paid or exposed account access, skip the investigation loop and move into the action plan.

Related Security Guides

Learn more about how to protect yourself from this type of threat.

Understanding this threat

FAQ

Is kdhema.ml safe to visit?

kdhema.ml received a trust score of 55/100 from ScamLens. Some minor concerns were identified but no critical threats were found. Exercise normal caution.

Was kdhema.ml flagged by any threat databases?

kdhema.ml was flagged by 1 out of 30+ threat intelligence sources. Specifically flagged by: maltrail. The detected threat categories include: general threat.

How old is kdhema.ml?

Registration date information for kdhema.ml is not publicly available through WHOIS records, which can itself be a risk indicator.

Does kdhema.ml use HTTPS and have a valid SSL certificate?

kdhema.ml uses an SSL certificate issued by C=US, ST=CA, L=San Francisco, O="CloudFlare, Inc.", CN=CloudFlare Inc ECC CA-2, valid until October 9, 2020. The certificate is from a free provider (Let's Encrypt/ZeroSSL), which is common but does not validate the organization's identity.

What security headers does kdhema.ml implement?

No security header information was available for kdhema.ml.

What does the ScamLens community think about kdhema.ml?

No community votes or reports have been submitted for kdhema.ml yet. You can be the first to share your experience.

Is this report useful?

Use this report to prompt others to keep cross-checking the email, phone number, and entity details instead of clearing it too early.

Forward to your parents — they deserve to browse safely too.

About this analysis

This report is generated from real-time data across 90+ threat intelligence sources, combined with AI analysis and community feedback.

Learn about our scoring methodology | Last analyzed: August 16, 2026