ScamLens analyzed reverselookup.com using 90+ threat intelligence sources and assigned a trust score of 70/100, classifying it as safe.
Trust Score: 70/100
Risk Level: Trusted
This domain already shows strong risk signals. Stop interacting, preserve the page, chat, phone, and payment evidence, and move into response or reporting immediately.
Quick Answer
This domain already shows strong risk signals. Stop interacting, preserve the page, chat, phone, and payment evidence, and move into response or reporting immediately.
Positive Signals
- + Domain has been active for 27 year
- + Google Safe Browsing: Safe
- + HTTPS encryption supported
Concerns
- - 3 security sources flagged as suspicious
Score Breakdown
Was this assessment accurate?
reverselookup.com looks legitimate
No threat feeds have flagged this domain. Use standard online-safety habits.
- Bookmark the official URLScammers often clone legitimate brands at look-alike domains. A saved bookmark protects you from typos.
- Watch for unexpected payment requestsEven legitimate sites can be hijacked. Treat unsolicited 'urgent payment' prompts as suspicious.
- Verify HTTPS + the exact spellingConfirm the lock icon, and inspect the domain letter-by-letter before entering passwords or card details.
Trust but verify — open this domain on unrelated security services and compare the verdict.
AI Risk Assessment
SafeWhat matters right now
With a high-risk result, the priority is not reading more pages. It is immediate containment, credential resets, evidence preservation, and the reporting path.
reverselookup.com presents mixed security signals. 1 Safe Browsing is clean, and 3 18 of 21 threat feeds are clean, indicating no confirmed malicious activity. However, 2 three threat feeds flagged the domain: VirusTotal (SUSPICIOUS), Shodan Internet DB (SUSPICIOUS_PORTS), and DNS Security (DNS_BLOCKED_MALWARE). 4 The domain is legitimately aged (registered 1998, 10213 days old) with MarkMonitor registrar and 5 .com is a low-risk TLD. 2 The flagged threat feeds suggest potential port exposure or historical DNS malware association, but lack confirmation from Safe Browsing. No community reports exist. [INFERENCE] The combination of three flagged feeds despite Safe Browsing clean status suggests possible infrastructure misconfiguration or residual threat intelligence rather than active exploitation.
Recommendation
Investigate the specific threat feed flags—particularly SUSPICIOUS_PORTS and DNS_BLOCKED_MALWARE—via Shodan and DNS reputation databases to confirm current threat status. If you operate this domain, audit open ports and DNS records. Verify Safe Browsing remains clean before engaging with sensitive transactions. Monitor for updates.
Sources
- Threat intelligence feeds (3 flagged)Threat intel
virustotal (SUSPICIOUS); shodan_internetdb (SUSPICIOUS_PORTS); dns_security (DNS_BLOCKED_MALWARE)
- 18/21 threat feeds responded cleanThreat intel
- WHOIS registration dataWHOIS
Registered 1998-06-27T04:00:00Z (10213 days ago), registrar: MarkMonitor Inc.
- TLD risk classification: .com (low risk)Analysis
Based on APWG / Spamhaus / Interisle 2024 abuse rankings
Powered by ScamLens AI· Check sources to verify important claims
Threat-intelligence sources
Checked across 21 sources — 3 flagged this domain
Show source breakdown
Threat-intelligence sources
Checked across 21 sources — 3 flagged this domain
- safe_browsing clean
- urlhaus clean
- cloudflare_radar clean
- cert_transparency clean
- alienvault_otx clean
- phishstats clean
- virustotal flagged
- ipqs clean
- abuseipdb clean
- securitytrails clean
- phishdestroy clean
- threatfox clean
- shodan_internetdb flagged
- phishtank clean
- urlscan clean
- rdap clean
- maltiverse clean
- dnsbl clean
- dns_security flagged
- wanted_domains clean
- openphish clean
ScamLens aggregates real-time signals from 90+ commercial and open-source threat-intelligence providers including Google Safe Browsing, VirusTotal, PhishTank, URLhaus, ThreatFox, Cloudflare Radar, OTX, IPQS, GoPlus, Honeypot.is, and more. A flagged signal is evidence; the absence of flags is not proof of safety. Use the signals below alongside community reports to decide.
Advanced Scan
Comprehensive data lookup across premium sources
- Website history verification
- Detailed WHOIS information
- Reverse WHOIS association
- Traffic rank analysis
- Company registration check
AI Deep Investigation
Cross-check the story, claims, and supporting evidence before you decide
- Everything in Advanced Scan
- AI website content analysis
- AI cross-reference verification
- Claim authenticity validation
- Detailed report with evidence
Comprehensive Investigation
Full-spectrum investigation with company deep search & social intelligence
- Everything in Deep Investigation
- AI company background search
- Social media intelligence
- Detailed suspicious point analysis
- Event timeline & entity connections
This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a legal determination.
Security Sources
Domain Information
- Registrar
- MarkMonitor Inc.
- Created
- June 27, 1998
- Expires
- June 26, 2033
- Domain Age
- 27 years
- DNSSEC
- Disabled
- Nameservers
- BLUE.FOUNDATIONDNS.COM, BLUE.FOUNDATIONDNS.NET, BLUE.FOUNDATIONDNS.ORG
- Domain Status
- client delete prohibited client transfer prohibited client update prohibited
SSL/TLS Certificate
No data available
Server Information
- IP Address
- 104.18.28.81
- Hosting Provider
- Cloudflare, Inc.
- ASN
- AS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.
- Server Location
- Toronto, Canada
- Organization
- Cloudflare, Inc.
Related Intelligence
Technical Details (DNS / Headers / Subdomains)
DNS Records
Email Security
SPF Not Configured DMARC Configured| Type | Value |
|---|---|
| A | 104.18.28.81 |
| A | 104.18.29.81 |
| AAAA | 2606:4700::6812:1c51 |
| AAAA | 2606:4700::6812:1d51 |
| MX | 1 smtp.google.com |
| NS | blue.foundationdns.org |
| NS | blue.foundationdns.com |
| NS | blue.foundationdns.net |
| TXT | apple-domain-verification=-IVYkS3rg2sI4cla0jdDGhh5oO3c2xhauJbB8uHqL9M |
| TXT | google-site-verification=4WxTHsT2aULnx_uSkaoJN4DnYLey9yB1siZPlmDoFqk |
| TXT | google-site-verification=EyX7wEXKJWp1GrOwQMxhS0X_9xgNimh-KovWVQPffu0 |
| TXT | google-site-verification=uVyhbMd0tuzN2duvKiu1pttn0pZen7OdOd9KXr7hVmM |
| TXT | prowly-verification=d98539dd35d1c34e41244248c148aa62703bb1765d98259f377f92780d6b35f3 |
HTTP Security Headers
2/6max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains; preload
nosniff
Channels / Subdomains
No data available
Community Reports
Log in to report and share your experience
High-Risk Signals
The risk signals are strong enough. Move on evidence preservation, reporting, and victim response now
This result is no longer just a normal verification case. Moving the chat, phone, payment, and official-reporting path in parallel is usually more important than waiting for more data.
Recommended First
Move into the victim action plan
If you already paid, logged in, or installed tools, use the action plan first to prioritize containment and evidence work.
Move into the website-reporting flow
Move the site, payment evidence, chat trail, and contact points into the formal reporting path.
Add the chat, DM, and payment-pressure trail
Keep the Telegram, WhatsApp, social DM, and payment-pressure trail in the same timeline.
Check the callback number and SMS
If the actor also used calls, SMS, or one-time codes, verify that phone path next.
The results are based on multiple third-party data sources and AI models. False positives or negatives may occur. This report should not be used as the sole basis for any decision. Please verify with additional sources.
If a loss already happened, move into the response flow now
Delay is the main risk with high-risk domains. Prioritize freezes, credential resets, reporting, and evidence preservation now.
If no loss happened yet, continue with the website-reporting and official-agency paths next.
Related Security Guides
Learn more about how to protect yourself from this type of threat.
FAQ
Is reverselookup.com safe to visit?
reverselookup.com received a trust score of 70/100 from ScamLens, based on analysis of 30+ threat intelligence sources. No significant threats were detected. The site appears safe and trustworthy.
Was reverselookup.com flagged by any threat databases?
reverselookup.com was flagged by 2 out of 30+ threat intelligence sources. Specifically flagged by: virustotal, dns_security. The detected threat categories include: general threat.
How old is reverselookup.com?
reverselookup.com was first registered on June 27, 1998, making it approximately 27 years old. This is an established domain with a history of operation.
Does reverselookup.com use HTTPS and have a valid SSL certificate?
ScamLens could not verify the SSL certificate details for reverselookup.com during this scan. Treat this as unavailable evidence, not as proof that the site is safe or unsafe.
What security headers does reverselookup.com implement?
reverselookup.com is missing important security headers: Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Strict-Transport-Security, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. Missing security headers can leave visitors vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) and other web-based attacks.
What does the ScamLens community think about reverselookup.com?
No community votes or reports have been submitted for reverselookup.com yet. You can be the first to share your experience.
Where is reverselookup.com hosted?
reverselookup.com is hosted by Cloudflare, Inc. in Toronto, Canada (ASN: ASAS13335 Cloudflare, Inc.).
What should I do about reverselookup.com?
Investigate the specific threat feed flags—particularly SUSPICIOUS_PORTS and DNS_BLOCKED_MALWARE—via Shodan and DNS reputation databases to confirm current threat status. If you operate this domain, audit open ports and DNS records. Verify Safe Browsing remains clean before engaging with sensitive transactions. Monitor for updates.
Is this report useful?
Use this report to tell others to stop interacting now and move straight into containment, evidence preservation, and reporting.
Forward to your parents — they deserve to browse safely too.
About this analysis
This report is generated from real-time data across 90+ threat intelligence sources, combined with AI analysis and community feedback.
Learn about our scoring methodology | Last analyzed: April 3, 2026